﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Antonin Scalia news stories on Newser</title><description>Read more Antonin Scalia stories on Newser</description><link>http://www.newser.com/taggrid/159/antonin-scalia.html</link><copyright>2012 - Newser</copyright><language>en-us</language><generator>Newser Feed Generator</generator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:48:11 CDT</pubDate><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/144760/court-seems-fine-with-arizona-immigration-law.html</guid><title>Court Seems Fine With Arizona Immigration Law</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=879618&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120425141739' border='0' /&gt;Today the Supreme Court heard the final arguments in the case over Arizona's controversial immigration law, and it's not looking good for the Obama administration. Justices seemed decidedly skeptical about the Justice Department's central argument that the law impinged on the federal government's power to control immigration, the Washington Post...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=879618&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120425141739" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">This artist rendering shows Paul Clement, arguing for Arizona, before the Supreme Court.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/144760/court-seems-fine-with-arizona-immigration-law.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:17:18 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/143384/justice-kagan-scalia-taught-me-how-to-hunt.html</guid><title>Justice Kagan: Scalia Taught Me How to Hunt</title><dc:creator>Dustin Lushing</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=876426&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120404152828' border='0' /&gt;They may be divided when it comes to judicial philosophy, but off the bench, liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan and conservative Antonin Scalia are ... hunting buddies. While visiting Marquette University, Kagan revealed that Scalia, an avid hunter, hosted her many times on trips to shoot pheasant and quail, reports...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=876426&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120404152828" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/143384/justice-kagan-scalia-taught-me-how-to-hunt.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:27:39 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/142987/are-conservatives-on-court-guilty-of-judicial-activism.html</guid><title>Are Conservatives on Court Guilty of Judicial Activism?</title><dc:creator>John Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=875406&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120329131127' border='0' /&gt;Today's big debate on health care reform seems to be whether the Supreme Court's conservatives were acting more like legislators than justices. Voices on the left think so and are raising cries of judicial activism. Pundits on the right disagree. A roundup of samples: EJ Dionne, Washington Post : Hey, he...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=875406&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120329131127" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">This artist rendering shows Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli speaking in front of the Supreme Court.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/142987/are-conservatives-on-court-guilty-of-judicial-activism.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:16:59 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/142915/todays-arguments-suggest-health-care-law-will-stand.html</guid><title>Final Day's Arguments Might Help ObamaCare</title><dc:creator>John Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=875279&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120329121002' border='0' /&gt;Court watcher Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog thinks today's arguments at the Supreme Court bode well for President Obama's health care law. His reasoning? Most justices seemed worried that if they struck down the central part of the law—the individual mandate requiring everyone to buy insurance—it would be too...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=875279&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120329121002" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">This artist rendering shows attorney Paul Clement speaking before the Supreme Court Wednesday.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/142915/todays-arguments-suggest-health-care-law-will-stand.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:20:10 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/138091/supreme-court-bans-warrantless-gps-tracking.html</guid><title>Supreme Court Bans Warrantless GPS Tracking</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=863864&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120123103948' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that the government must obtain a warrant before secretly affixing a GPS tracking device to a suspect's car. The case stemmed from an incident in which the FBI placed a tracker on a DC drug dealer's car, with the Obama administration arguing that Americans...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=863864&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120123103948" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">The US Supreme Court is seen in this October 1, 2010 file photo in Washington, DC.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/138091/supreme-court-bans-warrantless-gps-tracking.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:39:43 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/134074/crooks-best-friend-on-high-court-is-antonin-scalia.html</guid><title>Crooks' Best Friend on High Court Is ... Antonin Scalia?</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=853749&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20111127080857' border='0' /&gt;You might not think of arch-conservative Antonin Scalia as a crusader for convicts, but that’s exactly what the Supreme Court justice has become, leading a pro-defendant coalition based on his strict interpretation of the Constitution, the LA Times observes. Prosecutors are especially worried about his take on the 6th Amendment,...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=853749&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20111127080857" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia speaks to Richmond attorneys at a Richmond Bar luncheon in Richmond, Va., Thursday, Oct. 13, 2011.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/134074/crooks-best-friend-on-high-court-is-antonin-scalia.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 08:08:50 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/125766/hey-lefties-this-supreme-court-should-scare-you.html</guid><title>Hey, Lefties: This Supreme Court Should Scare You</title><dc:creator>Mark Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=833475&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110814102509' border='0' /&gt;With big issues working their way toward the Supreme Court on such vital issues as health care reform, same-sex marriage, affirmative action, and police stops of undocumented immigrants, liberals need to be on guard, writes longtime court-watcher Emily Bazelon for the New York Times . Sure, there are solid progressives, such...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=833475&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110814102509" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Democrats have done a much poorer job than Republicans at appointing young justices to the federal appeals courts.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/125766/hey-lefties-this-supreme-court-should-scare-you.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:25:05 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/121566/in-wal-mart-case-supreme-court-ignores-women-evidence.html</guid><title>In Wal-Mart Case, High Court Ignores Women, Evidence</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=821997&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110621122458' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court’s Wal-Mart ruling doesn’t just set the legal precedent that some companies are too big to sue. The court’s five conservatives—and all but one of its men—also declared that “sex discrimination is simply too pervasive to be a problem,” writes Dahlia Lithwick of Slate . Antonin Scalia’s...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=821997&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110621122458" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Carol Rosenblatt of Washington, right, and others, take part in rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, March 29, 2011.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/121566/in-wal-mart-case-supreme-court-ignores-women-evidence.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:24:41 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/112776/law-professors-seek-ethics-code-for-supreme-court-justices.html</guid><title>Supreme Court Judges Need Ethics Code: Professors</title><dc:creator>Matt Cantor</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=798280&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331173135' border='0' /&gt;More than 100 law professors want Congress to write a code of ethics for the Supreme Court to spell out for the first time when justices should recuse themselves from cases. The effort follows appearances by Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia at political events sponsored by the billionaire conservative...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=798280&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331173135" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">In this Nov. 20, 2009, file photo, Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia speaks at the Creighton University School of law annual dinner in Omaha, Neb.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/112776/law-professors-seek-ethics-code-for-supreme-court-justices.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:36:05 CST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
