﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Samuel A. Alito news stories on Newser</title><description>Read more Samuel A. Alito stories on Newser</description><link>http://www.newser.com/taggrid/16019/samuel-a-alito.html</link><copyright>2012 - Newser</copyright><language>en-us</language><generator>Newser Feed Generator</generator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:57:45 CDT</pubDate><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/125766/hey-lefties-this-supreme-court-should-scare-you.html</guid><title>Hey, Lefties: This Supreme Court Should Scare You</title><dc:creator>Mark Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=833475&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110814102509' border='0' /&gt;With big issues working their way toward the Supreme Court on such vital issues as health care reform, same-sex marriage, affirmative action, and police stops of undocumented immigrants, liberals need to be on guard, writes longtime court-watcher Emily Bazelon for the New York Times . Sure, there are solid progressives, such...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=833475&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110814102509" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Democrats have done a much poorer job than Republicans at appointing young justices to the federal appeals courts.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/125766/hey-lefties-this-supreme-court-should-scare-you.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:25:05 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/94005/supreme-court-extends-handgun-rights-nationwide.html</guid><title>Supreme Court Extends Handgun Rights Nationwide</title><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=744358&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331192039' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court says the Constitution's "right to keep and bear arms" applies nationwide as a restraint on the ability of government to limit its application. The justices' decision today casts doubt on a Chicago-area handgun ban, but their 5-4 vote also signaled that less severe restrictions could survive legal...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=744358&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331192039" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">The US Supreme Court extended gun rights nationwide, casting doubt on a Chicago ban.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/94005/supreme-court-extends-handgun-rights-nationwide.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:26:42 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/88451/40-approve-of-kagan-poll.html</guid><title>40% Approve of Kagan: Poll</title><dc:creator>Jane Yager</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=352364&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331195458' border='0' /&gt;Forty percent of Americans think Elena Kagan was an "excellent" or "good" choice for the Supreme Court, while 14% rate President Obama's choice of nominee "poor," according to a new Gallup poll. That puts Kagan's initial approval numbers in line with those for Bush nominees Samuel Alito and Harriet Miers,...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=352364&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331195458" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Solicitor General and Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan looks to President Barack Obama as she speaks during and an announcement in the East Room of the White House in Washington, May 10, 2010.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/88451/40-approve-of-kagan-poll.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 08:58:32 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/79493/alito-vs-obama-opposing-views.html</guid><title>Alito vs. Obama: Opposing Views</title><dc:creator>John Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=325560&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331204806' border='0' /&gt;Justice Samuel Alito's critical reaction during last night's State of the Union speech is still making waves: Shannen Coffin, National Review : "That Justice Alito betrayed his feelings in a minor way is understandable. ... In his preening, Obama flatly misrepresented the ruling" and showed an "utter lack of tact." Glenn Greenwald,...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=325560&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331204806" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">This video image shows Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, near top left, and fellow justices at the speech.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/79493/alito-vs-obama-opposing-views.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:24:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/79412/justice-alito-mouths-not-true-at-obama-criticism.html</guid><title>Justice Alito Mouths 'Not True' at Obama Criticism</title><dc:creator>Will McCahill</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=325345&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20111101162124' border='0' /&gt;Though Supreme Court justices normally sit impassively during the State of the Union address, Justice Samuel Alito took unusual umbrage to President Obama’s criticism of the court’s recent ruling on campaign finance—mouthing “ not true ” when Obama said the decision “reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=325345&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20111101162124" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">A screen grab of Justice Samuel Alito shaking his head during President Obama's State of the Union address.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/79412/justice-alito-mouths-not-true-at-obama-criticism.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:20:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/70988/roberts-court-disappoints-oconnor.html</guid><title>Roberts Court Disappoints O'Connor</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=299287&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331213422' border='0' /&gt;Sandra Day O’Connor is none too pleased with the conservative turn the Supreme Court has taken since she retired. Asked at a conference how she felt about the court overturning or undermining rulings she’d helped make on issues like abortion rights, campaign finance and race, she replied, “What would you...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=299287&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331213422" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">In a Sept. 19, 2007 file photo retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor addresses a meeting of Pennsylvania judges and lawyers in Harrisburg, Pa.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/70988/roberts-court-disappoints-oconnor.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:12:38 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/68619/justices-prepare-for-newest-family-member.html</guid><title>Justices Prepare for Newest 'Family Member'</title><dc:creator>Jason Farago</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=290152&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331214723' border='0' /&gt;When Sonia Sotomayor takes the bench for the first time next week, the Supreme Court will never be the same—as justice after justice tells C-Span in a rare interview program, each new member transforms the court's composition. John Roberts says that he looks at the bench "like people look...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=290152&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331214723" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">New Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor smiles as President Barack Obama applauds during a reception in her honor, Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009, in the East Room of the White House in Washington.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/68619/justices-prepare-for-newest-family-member.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:32:21 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/65516/gop-looks-tacky-in-vote-on-sotomayor.html</guid><title>GOP Looks Tacky in Vote on Sotomayor</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=229777&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331220421' border='0' /&gt;Senate Republicans locked arms against Sonia Sotomayor yesterday … or would have, if they’d bothered to stay for the Judiciary Committee’s vote. Instead, half ducked out, leaving Jeff Sessions to repeat “No by proxy,” over and over, writes Dana Milbank in the Washington Post . It was an ugly display of...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=229777&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331220421" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Jeff Sessions, ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, looks over his glasses during the committee's confirmation hearing for Sonia Sotomayor.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/65516/gop-looks-tacky-in-vote-on-sotomayor.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:56:00 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/60250/attacking-nominees-demeans-court.html</guid><title>Attacking Nominees Demeans Court</title><dc:creator>Harry Kimball</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=213023&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331223316' border='0' /&gt;The political attack ads popular in general elections have a profoundly negative effect on the public’s view of the Supreme Court when used during the nomination process, James L. Gibson writes fror Miller-McCune.com. “Politicized confirmation processes can indeed damage the institution of the US Supreme Court itself,” Gibson writes...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=213023&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331223316" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">President Barack Obama announces federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor, right, as his nominee for the Supreme Court.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/60250/attacking-nominees-demeans-court.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:53:02 CDT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
