﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>earmarks news stories on Newser</title><description>Read more earmarks stories on Newser</description><link>http://www.newser.com/taggrid/2215/earmarks.html</link><copyright>2012 - Newser</copyright><language>en-us</language><generator>Newser Feed Generator</generator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:28:07 CDT</pubDate><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/139246/lawmakers-shuffled-millions-to-relatives-causes.html</guid><title>Lawmakers Shuffled Millions to Relatives' Causes</title><dc:creator>Evann Gastaldo</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=866672&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120208073649' border='0' /&gt;A Washington Post investigation finds that 16 members of Congress have sent tax dollars, sometimes in the millions, to companies or other organizations with links to their family trees. Through direct funding or earmarking, these lawmakers have boosted the budgets of Pentagon programs, environmental groups, schools, and other places where...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=866672&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120208073649" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">The US Capitol building is seen Saturday, Nov., 19, 2011, in Washington.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/139246/lawmakers-shuffled-millions-to-relatives-causes.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:36:44 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/139137/lawmakers-use-earmarks-to-aid-own-properties.html</guid><title>Lawmakers Use Earmarks to Aid Own Properties</title><dc:creator>Rob Quinn</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=866452&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120207100649' border='0' /&gt;Members of Congress are not only steering earmarks to their own districts, but also their own backyards, funding projects that boost the value of properties they own, a Washington Post investigation finds. Comparing disclosure forms against public records revealed that over the last few years, some 33 members of Congress...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=866452&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120207100649" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">The Washington Post investigation compared financial disclosure forms to public records.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/139137/lawmakers-use-earmarks-to-aid-own-properties.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:55:13 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/139067/congress-dodging-earmark-ban-watchdogs.html</guid><title>Congress Dodging Earmark Ban: Watchdogs</title><dc:creator>Matt Cantor</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=866266&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120206095519' border='0' /&gt;Congress' ban on earmarks doesn't seem to be stopping members from channeling money to home-state projects. These days, instead of tacking such projects on to bills, legislators are creating "slush funds" that ultimately serve the same purpose, watchdog groups tell the New York Times . Included in the Army Corps of...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=866266&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120206095519" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Sen. Lindsey Graham, left, said he would hold up Obama appointees if his state didn't receive cash for dredging work.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/139067/congress-dodging-earmark-ban-watchdogs.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:58:05 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/137580/rick-santorum-earmarks-former-senator-was-prolific-at-securing-earmarks-campaign-cash-followed.html</guid><title>Rick Brought Home $1B in Pork—and Big Donations</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=862650&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120116125844' border='0' /&gt;In Rick Santorum's days in the Senate, lawmakers didn't have to disclose their earmarks—but a New York Times analysis shows that Santorum had a lot of them, and that they were often followed by large campaign contributions from the companies they benefited. In one defense bill, for example, Santorum...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=862650&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120116125844" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Rick Santorum speaks as he campaigns at the Faith and Freedom Coalition Prayer Breakfast in Myrtle Beach, SC, Jan. 15, 2012.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/137580/rick-santorum-earmarks-former-senator-was-prolific-at-securing-earmarks-campaign-cash-followed.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:09:27 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/134386/lawmakers-ignore-earmark-ban.html</guid><title>Lawmakers Ignore Earmark Ban</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=854521&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20111130130108' border='0' /&gt;Remember that informal ban on earmarks lawmakers agreed to last year to great fanfare? Well, they’ve been doing their best to ignore it, the Washington Post reports. Lawmakers have tried to slap hundreds of earmarks on at least 10 bills this summer and fall. While some have insisted their additions...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=854521&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20111130130108" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., is pushing for a law banning earmarks.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/134386/lawmakers-ignore-earmark-ban.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:00:48 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/110677/reid-earmarks-will-be-back.html</guid><title>Reid: Earmarks Will Be Back</title><dc:creator>Mark Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=792768&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331174228' border='0' /&gt;"They'll be back." No, not Terminator robots from the future, but something that some may consider nearly as deadly—earmarks. Harry Reid says President Obama is wrong to try to end the practice that allows members of Congress to insert benefits for their home states into bills. "The executive branch...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=792768&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331174228" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Harry Reid speaks to reporters after the weekly caucus luncheons on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 25, 2011.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/110677/reid-earmarks-will-be-back.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:58:55 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/107769/maple-syrup-research-no-joke-industry-to-john-mccain.html</guid><title>Syrup Research No Joke: Industry to McCain</title><dc:creator>Matt Cantor</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=785912&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331175842' border='0' /&gt;The omnibus spending bill may have failed , but one sticky situation persists: In compiling his list of the bill's 10 most egregious wastes of money, John McCain ridiculed a $165,000 earmark for maple syrup research as an example of absurd pork—but the maple industry says it’s anything but....</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=785912&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331175842" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., heads for the Senate floor for cloture votes on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/107769/maple-syrup-research-no-joke-industry-to-john-mccain.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:19:05 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/107596/earmarks-last-hurrah-bill-stuffed-with-8b.html</guid><title>Earmarks' Last Hurrah: Bill Stuffed With $8B</title><dc:creator>Evann Gastaldo</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=785458&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331175947' border='0' /&gt;Well, don’t say goodbye to earmarks just yet: A $1.2 trillion spending bill released yesterday has more than 6,000 earmarks—adding up to $8 billion. "The American people said just 42 days ago, 'Enough!' … Are we tone deaf? Are we stricken with amnesia?" asked John McCain...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=785458&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331175947" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington Thursday, Dec. 2, 2010.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/107596/earmarks-last-hurrah-bill-stuffed-with-8b.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:31:30 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/107221/uh-oh-gop-wakes-to-world-without-earmarks.html</guid><title>Uh, Oh: GOP Wakes to World Without Earmarks</title><dc:creator>Polly Davis Doig</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=784449&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331180154' border='0' /&gt;Killing earmarks in an era of big government and bigger deficits sure sounded like great conservative politics at the party last night, but none other than the House GOP is waking up with a hangover, wondering "What were we thinking?" As Politico reports, it turns out that ix-naying porky projects...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=784449&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331180154" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">In this Oct. 30, 2010 file photo, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., speaks in Blaine, Minn.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/107221/uh-oh-gop-wakes-to-world-without-earmarks.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:42:53 CST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
