﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>John Roberts news stories on Newser</title><description>Read more John Roberts stories on Newser</description><link>http://www.newser.com/taggrid/299/john-roberts.html</link><copyright>2012 - Newser</copyright><language>en-us</language><generator>Newser Feed Generator</generator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:04:25 CDT</pubDate><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/146545/liberals-trying-to-intimidate-chief-justice.html</guid><title>Liberals Trying to Intimidate Chief Justice</title><dc:creator>John Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=883879&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120522122939' border='0' /&gt;The Wall Street Journal 's editorial page thinks liberals are trying to "intimidate" the Supreme Court's justices, especially Chief Justice John Roberts, as the ruling on ObamaCare draws near. Those who support the law, including the "elite liberal press," have made clear they will try to ruin Roberts' legacy by...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=883879&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120522122939" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Chief Justice John G. Roberts.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/146545/liberals-trying-to-intimidate-chief-justice.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:29:34 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/144760/court-seems-fine-with-arizona-immigration-law.html</guid><title>Court Seems Fine With Arizona Immigration Law</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=879618&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120425141739' border='0' /&gt;Today the Supreme Court heard the final arguments in the case over Arizona's controversial immigration law, and it's not looking good for the Obama administration. Justices seemed decidedly skeptical about the Justice Department's central argument that the law impinged on the federal government's power to control immigration, the Washington Post...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=879618&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120425141739" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">This artist rendering shows Paul Clement, arguing for Arizona, before the Supreme Court.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/144760/court-seems-fine-with-arizona-immigration-law.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:17:18 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/142866/as-day-3-dawns-where-the-battle-for-obamacare-stands.html</guid><title>As Day 3 Dawns, Where the Battle for ObamaCare Stands</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=875143&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120328075347' border='0' /&gt;Yesterday's oral arguments in front of the Supreme Court went well for opponents of President Obama's health care law. "The government had in my view as bad a day as it reasonably could," the founder of SCOTUSblog says. "It won't cause the government to have a complete cardiac arrest—they'll...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=875143&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120328075347" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Security stands watch as people come out from the U.S. Supreme Court after the second day of oral arguments have finished March 27, 2012 in Washington, DC.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/142866/as-day-3-dawns-where-the-battle-for-obamacare-stands.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:53:43 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/138091/supreme-court-bans-warrantless-gps-tracking.html</guid><title>Supreme Court Bans Warrantless GPS Tracking</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=863864&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120123103948' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that the government must obtain a warrant before secretly affixing a GPS tracking device to a suspect's car. The case stemmed from an incident in which the FBI placed a tracker on a DC drug dealer's car, with the Obama administration arguing that Americans...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=863864&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120123103948" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">The US Supreme Court is seen in this October 1, 2010 file photo in Washington, DC.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/138091/supreme-court-bans-warrantless-gps-tracking.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:39:43 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/136566/supreme-court-chief-justice-john-roberts-my-peers-can-rule-on-obamacare.html</guid><title>Judge Roberts: All Justices Can Rule on Obamacare</title><dc:creator>Neal Colgrass</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=860231&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120102081047' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court's chief justice yesterday defended the right of his fellow justices to rule on Obamacare, the New York Times reports. John G. Roberts didn't mention justices Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan by name, but both are facing calls to withdraw from the ruling because of their past interest...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=860231&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120102081047" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts listens as President Obama addresses a Joint Session of Congress while delivering his State of the Union speech January 25, 2011, in Washington, DC.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/136566/supreme-court-chief-justice-john-roberts-my-peers-can-rule-on-obamacare.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:46:38 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/125766/hey-lefties-this-supreme-court-should-scare-you.html</guid><title>Hey, Lefties: This Supreme Court Should Scare You</title><dc:creator>Mark Russell</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=833475&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110814102509' border='0' /&gt;With big issues working their way toward the Supreme Court on such vital issues as health care reform, same-sex marriage, affirmative action, and police stops of undocumented immigrants, liberals need to be on guard, writes longtime court-watcher Emily Bazelon for the New York Times . Sure, there are solid progressives, such...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=833475&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110814102509" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Democrats have done a much poorer job than Republicans at appointing young justices to the federal appeals courts.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/125766/hey-lefties-this-supreme-court-should-scare-you.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:25:05 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/120980/supreme-courts-new-go-to-tool-the-dictionary.html</guid><title>Supreme Court's New Go-To Tool: the Dictionary</title><dc:creator>Matt Cantor</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=820405&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110614141946' border='0' /&gt;John Roberts may be the chief justice of the United States, but he recently pulled out a dictionary to learn the meaning of “of” for a ruling. Justices are looking more and more to dictionaries to help them settle cases—a trend that worries both legal experts and dictionary makers,...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=820405&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110614141946" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Justices like their dictionaries.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/120980/supreme-courts-new-go-to-tool-the-dictionary.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:52:21 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/120622/us-supreme-court-tosses-microsoft-appeal-from-2007-software-patent-case.html</guid><title>Supreme Court to Microsoft: Pay $290M Patent Violation</title><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=819303&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110609174852' border='0' /&gt;A classic David and Goliath scenario played out today as the Supreme Court ordered Microsoft to pay small Toronto software company i4i a $290 million judgment for infringing on one of its patents in its popular Microsoft Word. Lower courts ruled that Microsoft willfully infringed on the patent, and ordered...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=819303&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110609174852" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">The Microsoft logo is seen on the French branch office of Microsoft, in Issy-Les-Moulineaux, next to Paris.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/120622/us-supreme-court-tosses-microsoft-appeal-from-2007-software-patent-case.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:51:17 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/112857/ruth-marcus-mike-huckabee-sticks-up-for-gay-marriage-inadvertently.html</guid><title>Oops: Huckabee Defends Gay Marriage</title><dc:creator>Matt Cantor</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=798559&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331173059' border='0' /&gt;In attacking gay marriage, Mike Huckabee inadvertently offered an excellent defense of it, writes Ruth Marcus. He went from criticizing President Obama’s decision not to defend the gay-marriage ban to pointing out the difficult “economic reality of out-of-wedlock children.” The fact is, “gays and lesbians are clamoring for the right...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=798559&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331173059" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">In this Sept. 17, 2010, file photo, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee speaks in Washington.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/112857/ruth-marcus-mike-huckabee-sticks-up-for-gay-marriage-inadvertently.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:11:05 CST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
