﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Voting Rights Act news stories on Newser</title><description>Read more Voting Rights Act stories on Newser</description><link>http://www.newser.com/taggrid/5195/voting-rights-act.html</link><copyright>2012 - Newser</copyright><language>en-us</language><generator>Newser Feed Generator</generator><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:41:54 CDT</pubDate><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/141616/justice-dept-strikes-down-texas-voter-id-law.html</guid><title>Justice Dept. Strikes Down Texas Voter ID Law</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=872231&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120312114407' border='0' /&gt;The Obama administration has stepped in to block a controversial Texas law requiring voters to have a special ID card, on the grounds that it discriminates against minorities, particularly Hispanics. The Justice Department concluded that there was little evidence of voter fraud that would justify the law, and that it...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=872231&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120312114407" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Attorney General Eric Holder surveys the room before speaking at the Northwestern University law school, Monday, March 5, 2012 in Chicago.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/141616/justice-dept-strikes-down-texas-voter-id-law.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:44:05 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/137954/supreme-court-axes-texas-electoral-map.html</guid><title>Supreme Court Axes Texas Electoral Map</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=863441&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120120131148' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court threw out a federal court's draft of a Texas electoral map, saying it strayed too far from the one drawn by the state's Republican legislature. The decision, which was issued by the court as a whole, rather than signed by an individual justice, is a near-term win...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=863441&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20120120131148" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">A previous Texas congressional redistricting map is seen in this August 9, 2003 file photo.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/137954/supreme-court-axes-texas-electoral-map.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:11:45 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/81909/bush-enjoys-cheneys-attacks.html</guid><title>Bush Enjoys Cheney's Attacks</title><dc:creator>Kevin Spak</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=332245&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331203411' border='0' /&gt;George W. Bush today offered his first public endorsement of Dick Cheney’s repeated attacks on President Obama. “I’m glad Cheney is out there,” Bush declared at a reunion breakfast for administration alumni. But he said he would personally continue avoiding the spotlight. “I didn't like it when a certain former...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=332245&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331203411" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Former President George W. Bush looks on while meeting with Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, unseen, at the Istana or presidential palace on Monday Nov. 2, 2009, in Singapore.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/81909/bush-enjoys-cheneys-attacks.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:04:56 CST</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/63064/roberts-labors-to-bring-divided-court-together.html</guid><title>Roberts Labors to Bring Divided Court Together</title><dc:creator>Jason Farago</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=222150&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331221810' border='0' /&gt;John Roberts told the Senate in 2005 that the Supreme Court was too polarized, and as chief justice he promised to encourage harmony between the court's left and right blocs. Last week he delivered, with two 8-1 decisions on the Voting Rights Act and the strip-search of a 13-year-old girl....</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=222150&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331221810" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts speaks to students and faculty at the Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/63064/roberts-labors-to-bring-divided-court-together.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:35:38 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/62540/court-will-quash-key-voting-act-provision-next-time.html</guid><title>Court Will Quash Key Voting Act Provision—Next Time</title><dc:creator>Harry Kimball</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=220362&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331222100' border='0' /&gt;Today’ non-decision by the Supreme Court on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is actually a stern repudiation, Tom Goldstein writes for SCOTUSblog. Reading between the lines, Goldstein surmises that the court will strike down Section 5 when the next challenge comes if Congress does not significantly alter it...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=220362&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331222100" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">An NAACP supporter holds a sign in front of the US Supreme Court.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/62540/court-will-quash-key-voting-act-provision-next-time.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:20:02 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/62519/supreme-court-sidesteps-major-voting-rights-ruling.html</guid><title>Supreme Court Sidesteps Major Voting-Rights Ruling</title><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=220255&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331222105' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court ruled narrowly today in a challenge to the Voting Rights Act, exempting a small Texas district from a key provision of the law, but side-stepping the larger constitutional issue. The act requires Southern areas with a history of discrimination to get advance federal approval before changing election...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=220255&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331222105" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">In this March 5, 2009, file photo, the Supreme Court Building is seen in Washington.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/62519/supreme-court-sidesteps-major-voting-rights-ruling.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:04:09 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/54622/tiny-towns-move-may-redefine-voting-rights-act.html</guid><title>Tiny Town's Move May Redefine Voting Rights Act</title><dc:creator>Matt Cantor</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=194499&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331230427' border='0' /&gt;A Supreme Court case may soon bring about a momentous change in the nation's voting laws, all because a Texas town of 3,500 moved a polling station three blocks, the Wall Street Journal reports. A local official made the switch to a more convenient location, galled that he needed...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=194499&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331230427" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">A group of voters lining up outside the polling station in Peachtree, Alabama, a year after the Voting Rights Act was passed.  </media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/54622/tiny-towns-move-may-redefine-voting-rights-act.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:27:49 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/52849/supreme-court-limits-power-of-voting-rights-act.html</guid><title>Supreme Court Limits Power of Voting Rights Act</title><description>&lt;img src='http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=188572&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331231407' border='0' /&gt;The Supreme Court ruled today that a part of the Voting Rights Act aimed at helping minorities elect their preferred candidates only applies in electoral districts where minorities make up more than half the population, the AP reports. The decision could make it harder for some minority candidates to win...</description><media:content url="http://img1-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=188572&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331231407" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Djuana Belk-Massey looks over a sample ballot as she stands in line to vote at an early voting site in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/52849/supreme-court-limits-power-of-voting-rights-act.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:26:33 CDT</pubDate></item><item><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newser.com/story/47525/high-court-to-hear-challenge-to-voting-rights-act.html</guid><title>High Court to Hear Challenge to Voting Rights Act</title><dc:creator>Harry Kimball</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=170089&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331234232' border='0' /&gt;The US Supreme Court agreed today to hear a case that challenges a central section of the 1965 Voting Rights Act designed to protect minority voters in discriminatory districts, the New York Times reports. Section 5 of the law, which forces many Southern states and select districts elsewhere to get...</description><media:content url="http://img2-cdn.newser.com/getimage.aspx?mediaid=170089&amp;width=45&amp;height=45&amp;crop=Y&amp;updateddate=20110331234232" type="image/jpg" medium="image"><media:description type="plain">Members of the US Supreme Court.</media:description></media:content><link>http://www.newser.com/story/47525/high-court-to-hear-challenge-to-voting-rights-act.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:23:01 CST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
